CL-010Clinical Workflow
Medical History Documentation
Clinical Experience & Provider Productivity
Recommended pathTo be confirmed with PRN
- Capability status
- To be confirmed with PRN
- Transformation phase
- To be confirmed with PRN
- Effort
- To be confirmed with PRN
Current State / What We Learned
Observed today, as captured in the corrected assessment.
Clinicians frequently capture medical history manually in the subjective section or through ScribeIQ because structured PMH is unavailable
Desired Future State
The target way of working PRN and Raintree are aiming for.
Reduce manual clinician documentation during evaluations
Requirement / Gap
Automatically populate relevant PMH data into the evaluation workflow
Raintree Recommended Path
- Map patient-entered PMH into the clinical record and Scribe/evaluation workflow
- “Sync History data” button will pull over
- Subjective Tab:
- Mechanism of Onset
- Current Surgery Data
- Current Surgery Details
- Pain rating scores
- Work Status
- DOI
- Tracking Tab:
- Next MD Visit
Dependencies / Considerations
Requires digital intake adoption and field mapping
Outstanding Questions / Decisions
Which PMH fields can populate directly into the evaluation?
Evidence
Supporting screenshots from the corrected Detailed Transformation Assessment.
Source
Detailed Transformation Assessment (Corrected)Related opportunities
Related by workstream and subject matter. These are not stated dependencies unless the assessment says so.